Perform[cb] Adds Partner Development Team as Networks Prioritise Publisher Quality

Perform[cb] has announced the formation of a dedicated Partner Development Team, signaling what could mark a broader shift within affiliate networks toward prioritising publisher relationships and compliance oversight in the wake of mounting attribution controversies. The move arrives as networks face increasing pressure to demonstrate that they actively vet and support the publishers operating within their ecosystems, rather than simply facilitating transactions between brands and partners.

The Florida-based performance marketing company revealed that McClain Sherman, a 10-year veteran of the organization, has been promoted to Vice President of Partner Development to lead the initiative. According to the announcement, the team will focus on recruiting high-performing partners, reactivating priority relationships, and expanding distribution across mobile channels and emerging markets.

Brad Dobbins, Chief Operating Officer at Perform[cb], framed the initiative around supporting sustainable partner growth. The company emphasised that the Partner Development Team operates within its Outcome Engine framework, which the network positions as rewarding quality and consistency over sheer transaction volume.

Networks Face Attribution Accountability After Honey Fallout

The timing of Perform[cb]'s announcement reflects broader industry dynamics following the PayPal Honey attribution controversy that erupted in late 2024. As documented throughout the unveiling of this story, Rakuten Advertising became the first major network to remove Honey from its platform in January 2026, establishing precedent that networks bear responsibility for publisher practices that exploit attribution mechanics even when those practices don't violate explicit contractual terms.

Impact.com followed with its own removal of the browser extension, demonstrating that networks will enforce standards exceeding legal compliance requirements when publisher behaviour systematically disadvantages content creators or manipulates commission flows with Awin taking an altogether different partner approach. 

The Honey controversy has highlighted fundamental questions about what responsibility that affiliate networks carry for policing partners to operate within their technical compliance rules. Browser extensions that ignore stand-down protocols or provide minimal consumer value while diverting attribution now face removal risk across major platforms, representing a meaningful evolution from fraud-focused compliance toward quality thresholds evaluating genuine partner contribution and activities.

Publisher Management Teams Signal A Strategic Response

For affiliate program managers, the establishment of dedicated publisher development and tracking infrastructure at networks like Perform[cb] indicates recognition that recruitment alone creates insufficient value. Quality publisher relationships deliver measurably better performance than scale-focused approaches, according to research from the Affiliate & Partner Marketing Association, with brands consistently priortising incrementality and audience alignment above raw traffic volume.

The partner development model Perform[cb] describes addresses several operational realities affiliate managers confront when working with network publishers. Programs need verification that publishers genuinely create value rather than simply capture attribution at checkout. Most critically, they need networks actively managing publisher quality rather than treating approval as an automated gateway.

Networks building dedicated teams for publisher support, optimisation guidance, and compliance monitoring effectively signal that they view relationship quality as a competitive differentiation. This represents a structural shift from models where networks primarily provided technical infrastructure and payment support while leaving relationship management to individual advertisers to manage.

Compliance Infrastructure Becomes A Competitive Network Advantage

The formation of partner development teams also reflects intensifying regulatory scrutiny across performance marketing. In the US particularly as FTC enforcement of the Consumer Review Rule demonstrated, affiliates compensated for review generation face compliance exposure across commission structures. Programs cannot simply rely on publisher assurances about product experience or content authenticity but now need to have tighter compliance monitoring from both a marketing and technical perspective too.

Networks that proactively monitor publisher practices, enforce promotional guidelines, and provide compliance guidance reduce risk exposure for the brands operating within their platforms. For Advertisers evaluating network partnerships, the presence of dedicated publisher development resources indicates whether a platform treats quality assurance as cost centre or strategic investment. Networks that view compliance monitoring and relationship management as value-add services differentiate themselves from those viewing approval and tracking as sufficient publisher support.

Three Takeaways for Affiliate Program Managers Working with Affiliate Networks to Consider

1. Evaluate network publisher management capabilities systematically. Ask prospective networks specific questions about how they vet publishers before approval, what ongoing monitoring systems detect problematic practices, and whether dedicated teams support publisher compliance. Networks describing approval as automated or positioning development teams purely as account management may lack the infrastructure necessary to prevent attribution issues.

2. Demand transparency about publisher removal policies. Following Rakuten and Impact's removal of Honey, affiliate managers should understand under what circumstances networks will proactively remove publishers from their platforms. Networks unwilling to enforce quality standards beyond legal compliance expose programs to reputation risk and channel cannibalization from partners who technically comply while undermining program value.

3. Prioritise publisher quality metrics over reach in partner recruitment. The shift toward dedicated partner development teams validates what experienced managers have practiced for years: programs succeed through strategic partnerships with publishers who deliver incremental value rather than maximum scale with minimal vetting. Building recruitment processes that emphasize audience alignment, content authority, and genuine contribution positions programs to benefit from industry evolution toward quality-focused models.

The formation of partner development teams at networks reflects lessons learned from attribution controversies that exposed gaps between technical compliance and genuine value creation. 

For affiliate managers, this represents welcome industry maturation, assuming networks invest these teams with authority to enforce meaningful standards rather than simply rebranding existing account management functions.

Join the industry's top marketers and stay ahead with the latest affiliate marketing trends. Sign up for our weekly newsletter from the leading source for industry news, insights, and strategic analysis.